About DaySteps
DaySteps is grounded in executive-function research. Not every design choice can cite a study — but the important ones can, and do.
How it's grounded
Executive function is the set of cognitive processes that plan, sequence, and carry out intentional behavior — working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility. It develops over years and is unevenly distributed.
DaySteps is not a treatment, a diagnostic, or a cure. It is a compensation tool — a calm external scaffold that makes up for what a child's internal scaffolding hasn't fully built yet. It's a therapeutic support tool that complements professional care, not a standalone clinical intervention.
The design choices — no streaks, no comparisons, no alarm-register colors, deliberate language — come directly from research on shame, motivation, and intrinsic regulation in neurodivergent children.
Principles in the product
Choice 01
Working-memory research says visible queues of unfinished items consume the same attention a child needs to finish the current one. The child-facing runner shows exactly one step, never the full sequence.
Zelazo et al. (2017)Choice 02
Time blindness is a core ADHD feature, not a behavior choice. Concrete visual timers are a documented intervention. Every step has an optional one.
Barkley (1997); Zheng et al. (2022)Choice 03
Stress elevates catecholamines, which suppress the prefrontal cortex — the region responsible for executive function. No alarm-register red in child UI, zero punitive states, zero failure mechanics.
Arnsten (2009, 2011)Choice 04
Streaks, points, badges, and leaderboards spike cortisol and undermine intrinsic motivation. Completion feedback — immediate, competence-framed acknowledgment at task completion — is clinically distinct from gamification, and is what we use.
Clinical consensusChoice 05
DaySteps starts fully structured and reduces external support as the child demonstrates consistency — mapped to ABA prompting hierarchies. The goal is reduced reliance on the app, not permanent dependency on it.
Zelazo et al.; Greer (2002)Choice 06
Zelazo et al. (2017) identify autonomy support as a driver of EF development above and beyond general positive parenting. Children should experience the routine as their own tool — not a surveillance system imposed on them.
Zelazo et al. (2017)EF skills themselves can be a target of practice-based instruction… leading not only to improved EF but also to improved academic achievement.
Zelazo, Blair & Willoughby (2017) · IES / U.S. Dept. of Education
Selected references
Ready when you are
You're on the list — we'll be in touch.